|
I want t0 know for all the rank 9+ player think about getting new upgrade
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
+1 to Main Attack
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade
I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
-10 inf cost +1 range, its just too op. No more upgrades necessary. If I could I would play without upgrades every game but then people would complain.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
i agree with this... however... it would be nice to have something to upgrade... maybe a weak optional unit that can only be given to lower ranks in game. Just to mix it up a bit.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.
We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.
----
"Whenever death may surprise us, let it be welcome if our battle cry has reached even one receptive ear and another hand reaches out to take up our arms".
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.
We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I don't think high ranks need any more upgrades.
We could, however, have some options to spend our SP. That could be done with custom flags, icons, images and colors, for example.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade
I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?
why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 27.09.2014 at 09:43
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade
I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?
why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+
ok brb playing a rp to get to r9
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Ecrit par Htin, 27.09.2014 at 09:43
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 22:04
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 20:51
Ecrit par Htin, 24.09.2014 at 19:47
I feel like that would give higher ranks a greater advantage they dont need
who cares about low rank they should be put back to begginer room, we need more upgrade that what makes most strategy game fun. improvement upon improvement
That's the thing, if it's truly a strategy game then the only benefit one should get from playing for a long time is experience and a better sense for the game. But the more upgrades you add, the harder it is for a rank 5 or 6 with no premium to beat a rank 10 or 11 with premium, as there's not a whole lot of strategy involved in having faster units, luckier, cheaper, etc.
technology plus why would a low rank play with a high rank if he r she know she will lose and rank doesn't matter
Low ranks play with high ranks often enough, not so much in 3v3, but even there we see r8 vs r10 or 11, but more in world games or ancients. Why shouldn't we play with lower ranked players? The more upgrades have an affect on the game, the more lower ranks will play high sp games like rp to get to a higher rank for them upgrades.
once you get all upgrade , aw becomes boring and repetitive. plus low rank are rp, this isn't good for player of higher rank since it took a long time to earn their sp. With rp it takes you 4 month to get all upgrade, whereas a non-rp player it takes about 2 year to get all upgrade
I agree it must become more repetitive after rank 10, and the rp problem is exactly as you said it. Would they rather take time to learn skills in like 1-2 year, or rp for a few months and get all those upgrades which will give them an advantage over most of the community that isn't r10 +?
why you even whinning this the decision fr rank 9+
ok brb playing a rp to get to r9
rp is bad
----
Hi
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
Bosnjak Amko Ce compte a été effacé |
Bosnjak Amko Ce compte a été effacé
There should be upgrades because I would like to see more respect to higger ranks LeL.
That's gonna bring us more care about ranks in cw games just like in old days were every rank counts...
10,10,10 vs 10,9,7 wouldn't be same before/after this idea.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
I like the idea of new upgrades, some of these are decent, but just in general more should be added
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
This again...
pls just suggest one extra upgrade or something not ''more upgrades'' as not only would it make the difference between ranks bigger, but it would encourage people to rather concentrate on sp rather than skill.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Chargement...
Chargement...
|