Are the drawbacks in the Strategies Worth the benefits?

I am curious as to whether or not the Drawbacks in certain Strategies are worth the benefits they provide. Many may disagree to either or so please explain.

All the strategies are as balanced as they have ever been. Of course every has it's pro and con. If you're not interested in having both, then you could pick "None" as a strategy. But I think None is the only strategy with No pro although it is quite a bad strategy.

It's just preference whether you like to use tanks or infantry or bombers and etc.

Try them all out and you will get a better feel for each one.

Thanks. I appreciate it.

Ecrit par tannerdaman, 03.01.2016 at 00:28

Thanks. I appreciate it.

Make sure to buy upgrades based on what style you play. I don't like RA much, but it's useful in world games and high funds. I see you like to use GW and MoS, so you're probably into stealth. Faster infantry helps with all strategies so I'd buy that first (Assuming you got air transport capacity, transport capacity, subs, marines, and militia before), but then you could move to faster marines then cheaper marines if you're still into stealth. However you should give strategies such as PD, SM, NC, and IMP(looks like you already play it) a try. They're all different styles and could suit you more, and if you really like the game and want a general/general upgrades/more strategies ( a lot of other things too) you could consider getting premium which unlocks 5 more strategies, 3 of them great and 2 meh.

Got it. Ill make sure to save up my SP