GO AMERICA, KILL ISIL

GO GO GO GO

It would have been easier if US hadn't supplied the extremist groups against Assad's government in the first place. But yeah, go go go and kill the monster yourself created!

Obama Proposes $500 Million to Aid Syrian Rebels
CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels
Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels

UNITED STUPID ARMY

Ecrit par Pinheiro, 23.09.2014 at 09:49

It would have been easier if US hadn't supplied the extremist groups agains Assad's government in the first place. But yeah, go go go and kill the monster yourself created!

Obama Proposes $500 Million to Aid Syrian Rebels
CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels
Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels

Ecrit par Guest, 23.09.2014 at 13:29

Ecrit par Your Monkey, 23.09.2014 at 12:58

Ecrit par Pinheiro, 23.09.2014 at 09:49

It would have been easier if US hadn't supplied the extremist groups agains Assad's government in the first place. But yeah, go go go and kill the monster yourself created!

Obama Proposes $500 Million to Aid Syrian Rebels
CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels
Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels

GO USA WOO HOO

TERRORISTS YOUR GAME IS THROUGH, CAUSE NOW YOU HAVE TO ANSWER TO... AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!!111shift

Ecrit par Guest, 23.09.2014 at 13:36

Ecrit par Guest, 23.09.2014 at 13:29

Ecrit par Your Monkey, 23.09.2014 at 12:58

Ecrit par Pinheiro, 23.09.2014 at 09:49

It would have been easier if US hadn't supplied the extremist groups agains Assad's government in the first place. But yeah, go go go and kill the monster yourself created!

Obama Proposes $500 Million to Aid Syrian Rebels
CIA begins weapons delivery to Syrian rebels
Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Just don't think that everything that moves around that region and has a gun is an islamist (Islamic extremist).
Please recognize that this religious aberration (extremist political interpretation of religious dogmas) also is based on a social cause (extreme necessities of a population that has been excluded from modernity and its access to a certain standard of living).
Misery + Fundamentalism + lack of political participation + western (and eastern) interventionism = ISIS (aberration with pseudo-religious foundations)

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 07:17

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Did I stutter

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 07:17

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Bitch?

Ecrit par Pinheiro, 23.09.2014 at 09:49

It would have been easier if US hadn't supplied the extremist groups against Assad's government in the first place. But yeah, go go go and kill the monster yourself created!

Welcome to the Military Industrial Complex. To create crisis after crisis for the sake of solving it and making money from the demand in arms.

Ecrit par Columna Durruti, 24.09.2014 at 07:30

Just don't think that everything that moves around that region and has a gun is an islamist (Islamic extremist).
Please recognize that this religious aberration (extremist political interpretation of religious dogmas) also is based on a social cause (extreme necessities of a population that has been excluded from modernity and its access to a certain standard of living).
Misery + Fundamentalism + lack of political participation + western (and eastern) interventionism = ISIS (aberration with pseudo-religious foundations)

"pseudo religious" Hue. Religion of peace?

Political participation isn't the issue. The lack of strong state governments creating functional societies is. No one cares if they can or can't vote. Western social democracies have proven how ridiculous such a concept is.

But this is your Anarchy at work, CD. A borderless territory of groups fighting for a piece. Sure, intervention from different factions caused this but this is your Anarchy. Without borders, without territories, without a stable government and without populace union, power groups will eventually form. You should be happy to see the realistic conclusion to your wonderful stateless, borderless dream.

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

He thinks 'White People' run the US government and industry. Top kek. So they cull non whites in the Middle East but open their borders to them in America. xaxaxa

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 10:27

But this is your Anarchy at work, CD. A borderless territory of groups fighting for a piece. Sure, intervention from different factions caused this but this is your Anarchy. Without borders, without territories, without a stable government and without populace union, power groups will eventually form. You should be happy to see the realistic conclusion to your wonderful stateless, borderless dream.

nice ignorance tik What you explain above is "your" anarchy.This is what anarchy is all about through the eyes of of a right wing facist.Because thats how far your brains are able to expand after all the brainwashing you guys have been subjected to..
Anarchism is not about simply no rules and no government.The word itself comes from the Greek αναρχια which means no authority.It doesnt mean no laws, no ethics and simply no government.Its way more than that.In a nutshell its about decentralization, peace and freedom.Words that do not exist in a right winger's vocabulary, i know.In order to work, key components are voluntary cooperation and mutual respect for other people and their liberties and freedoms while retaining ones self determination.All these aspects are missing from your ISIS, in which you based your weak comparison with.Isis has all the components of a facist state actually, the only thing missing is a central government.So maybe a better comparison would be ISIS with your ideal utopian facist UK?

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 10:47

nice ignorance tik What you explain above is "your" anarchy.This is what anarchy is all about through the eyes of of a right wing facist.Because thats how far your brains are able to expand after all the brainwashing you guys have been subjected to..

Who brainwashed me? Go on. What state institution promotes Fascism? What media groups espouses National Socialism? Even on Atwar, denial of genocides, racialism is forbidden. So who brainwashed me? YOUR ideology is planted in collaeges by Marxist professors who dominate education. It is not me who is brainwashed. It is you, Mr MultiCult.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 10:47

Anarchism is not about simply no rules and no government.The word itself comes from the Greek αναρχια which means no authority.It doesnt mean no laws, no ethics and simply no government.Its way more than that.In a nutshell its about decentralization, peace and freedom.Words that do not exist in a right winger's vocabulary,

Again, all assumptions. Anarchy doesn't come about peacefully, states don't just fall apart peacefully. They fall apart chaotically, violently. Groups within these states who have all been radiclaised over this period will then seek to take power, violently. They will reach a radical zenith almost always gravitating towards authority. Even the Spanish Anarchists succumbed to Stalinism. It is inevitable. Your version of Anarchism requires a mass realisation by billions of people to collude and destabilise states slowly. Don't pretend this isn't a requirement. It's Marxist theory. It is dictated directly in early Marxist rhetoric. First collapse, then a dictatorship of the proletariat. Instead, Lenin decided to force such a collapse. Look what happened when these state failures happened in Western Europe. WHo won? Fascists. Fascism doesn't work on the belief that the world will eventually hold hands, it understands that it never will. The best solution for a local people is to seek local power for their local interests. That is Fascism. Once you cross international bounds and you start talking about some utopianist fantasy of peace and freedom, you are a dreamer. You are delusional. Your ideology is a delusion with no previous successes. Not a single successful attempt, most led to brutal communist dictatorships. The Middle East is a perfect example of what happens when states fail and radical fringe groups fight for power. As states desablise in the Middle East, it radicalised the population. Especially young males. Young males are THE key criteria of any radical group, they are the soldiers. IRadical Islam, Communism, Fascism, they all have an ideology with hsitory and spirit. They all have the ability and charisma to wield authority, they can inspire the hearts of young men. They can create soldiers. What can Anarchism do? What does it inspire? It's a fringe group made up of sub fringe groups with no fundamental goal or values.

Don't belittle me as if I don't understand your theories. As if I have never heard them a thousand times before. The audacity to call me brainwashed when you yourself fight for globalist establishment ideals like Multi Culturalism in some vain effort to prevent NUCLEAR WAR (OH GOD FEARMONGERING)

I know the theory and theory almost never works in practise. THIS is your practice, this is your Anarchy. Are there any Pro Anarchist groups in the Middle East? No. There never will be. Your theory requires specific environments for it to take place. That environment will never exist, its not in our instinctive behavior. Only Western societies have any chance of actual 'anarchy' that you dream. And every time a western government fails, the Fascist state will take its place. And this time, there wont be a Soviet Union or Atlantic Empire to crush it.

Do you really think Russia and China would support such little pieces of anarchy? They will see a weak territory and they will take it. That is how states and tribes have operated. Always.There will never be a time where states across the world will fail. They are too powerful, when a state falls, another will takes its territory.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 10:47

i know.In order to work, key components are voluntary cooperation and mutual respect for other people and their liberties and freedoms while retaining ones self determination.All these aspects are missing from your ISIS, in which you based your weak comparison with.Isis has all the components of a facist state actually, the only thing missing is a central government.So maybe a better comparison would be ISIS with your ideal utopian facist UK?

You just proved my point. When states destablise, radical groups with authoritarian foundational theory with the will to use force will take power. Your 'Anarchists,' if they ever had the ability to take power with the will to use force will not relinquish it. No one relinquishes power. The very idea of anarchists using force to take territory is an oxymoron. The whole concept is riddled with doublethink.

America used the ISIS to insuilt the muslims yet again and make everyone hate them , they even mentioned it as a state !! They dont controll more than 5 cities "full controll" , they made a world cln with 40 states!!! Against a militia group that actually doesnt have 1/8 USA militry strength , i am not saying ISIS is a good militia it totally the opposite they should be destroed but think about it for a sec 40+ states for militia group doesnt that make you wonder...

meanwhile in russia

Ecrit par YazanTheSexy, 24.09.2014 at 11:36

America used the ISIS to insuilt the muslims yet again and make everyone hate them , they even mentioned it as a state !! They dont controll more than 5 cities "full controll" , they made a world cln with 40 states!!! Against a militia group that actually doesnt have 1/8 USA militry strength , i am not saying ISIS is a good militia it totally the opposite they should be destroed but think about it for a sec 40+ states for militia group doesnt that make you wonder...

It is a state. It calls itself a state. It functions as a state. America doesn't care who it harms, even its own citizens. It seeks interests for its lobbyists and banking controllers. ISIS opposes the status quo in the Middle East. When Iran and the US are willing to agree on an issue, it usually means that issue is significant.

Radical Islam is the Communism of the 21st century.

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 12:02

Ecrit par YazanTheSexy, 24.09.2014 at 11:36

America used the ISIS to insuilt the muslims yet again and make everyone hate them , they even mentioned it as a state !! They dont controll more than 5 cities "full controll" , they made a world cln with 40 states!!! Against a militia group that actually doesnt have 1/8 USA militry strength , i am not saying ISIS is a good militia it totally the opposite they should be destroed but think about it for a sec 40+ states for militia group doesnt that make you wonder...

It is a state. It calls itself a state. It functions as a state. America doesn't care who it harms, even its own citizens. It seeks interests for its lobbyists and banking controllers. ISIS opposes the status quo in the Middle East. When Iran and the US are willing to agree on an issue, it usually means that issue is significant.

Radical Islam is the Communism of the 21st century.

How come , it doesnt have the power nor the cities to call themself a state + even if they were that strong cant USA beat them alone?? + why the fuck did they wait all this time to start attacking them?? They could have beat ISIS before ISIS even reached the Mousl doors " iraq main army city + second iraqi cities" ?? Is this another iraw ocupation for oil as what they did to Saddam?? Or is a major attack on islam ??

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

Who brainwashed me? Go on. What state institution promotes Fascism? What media groups espouses National Socialism? Even on Atwar, denial of genocides, racialism is forbidden. So who brainwashed me? YOUR ideology is planted in collaeges by Marxist professors who dominate education. It is not me who is brainwashed. It is you, Mr MultiCult.

1.Please dont confuse Marxism with Anarchism and on another note, dont confuse communism with anarchism.They are not the same.
2.Marxist professors dominate education, thats a little absurd lol.Scools nowdays, in my opinion, promote capitalism, obedience to government and its laws, respect for religion and conservatism.They make for good little sheeps, programmed to conserve capitalism, who in most cases lack individuality and free thinking, thats why youth is so easily corrupted by facist groups, also.
*not to foget the obvious also.That most facist groups serve governments interests in many different ways.In most cases, the governments allow these facist groups, political or not, to exist and always serve a puspose.Not to forget also, that right wing and facists were always supportive of the big businesses, the banks, the elite and where the big money went.Always.So a governments real enemy is never a facist, but a leftist.Or an anarchist.Or a communist.
3.There are alot of groups who promote facism.Political (uk has a strong one, doesnt it?) and non-political.The internet especially is a nice lair and full of them.They are like a spider-web, who attract dissapointed and confused young people.They can be very convincing, to people who are half-informed about whats going on around them and who never learn to open their minds, think on their own and stop being self-centered.Easy to get brainwashed there.
4.Atwar censors some posts, that is true.But sometimes it has to do with the objectiveness, bias, motives of the poster and the post itself and the facts and evidence that support a said claim or a statement.Examples is how i made a strong case about the misconseptions about Jews and their past and how the media and governments are disgustingly victimize and lie about them.I provided evidence and facts, supported by impartial historians and journalists to prove that the Jewish community, has acted throughout history in such a malicious, provocative and power-hungry way, that justifies every misfortune and tragedy, that ever happened to them.Nobody erased that post.Strong, well constructed, valid arguments, backed up by evidence and facts to support your conclusion, is the correct way to do this.

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

Marx this marx that marx marx marx

I admire and respect Marx and value him as one of the greatest philosophers.That being said he is not my source of inspiration, or the basic figure of my ideology, so you can stop calling him out, on every oppurtunity.Your point that Marxism led to Stalinism and the "bad" communism, is exactly the difference between anarchism and marxism, in practise.I will explain below.

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

Again, all assumptions. Anarchy doesn't come about peacefully, states don't just fall apart peacefully. They fall apart chaotically, violently.Your version of Anarchism requires a mass realisation by billions of people to collude and destabilise states slowly. Don't pretend this isn't a requirement.Once you cross international bounds and you start talking about some utopianist fantasy of peace and freedom, you are a dreamer. You are delusional. Your ideology is a delusion.What can Anarchism do? What does it inspire? It's a fringe group made up of sub fringe groups with no fundamental goal or values.

Exactly.Now you seem to understand 100%.It cannot simply work through just a coup or a revolustion.We have to fight ideals and brainwashing imprinted on human way of thinking, since hundred of years.Change has to be slow.You start by decentralizing and decreasing the government's powers.Then tax like a motherfucker the big money and the big businesses.Then add people, to all decision-making in all national AND foreign matters.(hi daily referendums) Then you slowly get rid of other forms of authority, that work like a cancer, on human prosperity and evolution, like religion and military and subsidy the science and technology sector.You reconstruct the educational system.A complete overhaul.And you start going through the whole constitution and laws, from the beginning, making changes, slowly,patiently, testing them one by one, using refrerendums again.This will take alot of work and TIME, to work and show results.But its a start.And a path to a better world.And a step closer to anarchy.Not so utopian now, is it?That was my proposal.What is yours?What do the right wing facists, or capitalists propose for our future?Other than war, poverty, misery, aids and the destruction of our planet?

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

The Middle East is a perfect example of what happens when states fail and radical fringe groups fight for power. As states desablise in the Middle East, it radicalised the population. Especially young males. Young males are THE key criteria of any radical group, they are the soldiers. IRadical Islam, Communism, Fascism, they all have an ideology with hsitory and spirit. They all have the ability and charisma to wield authority, they can inspire the hearts of young men. They can create soldiers.

The middle east is a perfect example, of what happens when countries are subjected to facism for too long.And im sorry but no exceptions, from me.Some of the countries there, have ties with the West and are a little more modern, but the WHOLE middle east, is facism 101.Facism that goes hand to hand with illeteracy, uneducated people, fear, poverty, diseases, deprivation of human rights and liberties, non existent science and technological sector all backed up by strong extreme forms of authority, shared (or not) by government and religion.You just support a more modern facism, thats the only difference there.And yes you are right, in the end communism, facism and Islamism are one and the same.They are all based on oppression and power.They have a history of making the world a shittier place.Care to prove me wrong?All we got from these ideologies so far are loss of lifes, diseases and destruction of precious planets resources.So why keep believing in them?

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

Don't belittle me as if I don't understand your theories. As if I have never heard them a thousand times before. The audacity to call me brainwashed when you yourself fight for globalist establishment ideals like Multi Culturalism in some vain effort to prevent NUCLEAR WAR (OH GOD FEARMONGERING)

Im sorry you felt that way, it was not my intention to belittle you.I always respect your points of view.But you belittled your self in this one, because your comparison was not only falacious, but looked like a 10 year old came up with it.You compared an ultra facist moovement with anarchim, just because of one similarity.That being said, multi-culturalism, shouldnt be something to fight for it.Respecting peoples colour,beliefs and sexuality should be something taken for granted and not something you have to fight for.And yes i am sorry for fearing a nuclear war.I am sorry for fearing that we deplete our planets resources.I am sorry that i care for us fucking up our planet and dancing near its destruction.

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 11:28

Are there any Pro Anarchist groups in the Middle East? No. There never will be. Your theory requires specific environments for it to take place. That environment will never exist, its not in our instinctive behavior. Only Western societies have any chance of actual 'anarchy' that you dream. And every time a western government fails, the Fascist state will take its place.
Do you really think Russia and China would support such little pieces of anarchy? They will see a weak territory and they will take it. That is how states and tribes have operated. Always.There will never be a time where states across the world will fail. They are too powerful, when a state falls, another will takes its territory.

Russia, China and Middle East have all made their decisions and their intentions are clear.If i want to be realistic, i have little hope for them.They act in such an un-democratic way, that make weak candidates for these kinds of changes.They have more in-common with facism.I already discussed about these countries governments violations of human rights and against the liberties of their people, i think no point to bring these up again.The west however yes.I know the capitalism monster is big and scary, but i have hope.One step at a time.Internet is a gift.I trully believe people will start waking up.They already have.And the weapon is not a kalashnikov, but free information and knowledge.Made available through the internet.

Ecrit par 4Chan, 24.09.2014 at 07:49

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 07:17

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Bitch?

Your post os bad, and you should feel bad, Now gatorade me bitch

Ecrit par 4Chan, 24.09.2014 at 07:49

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 07:17

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Did I stutter

You stuttered so bad we got this post.

Ecrit par avatar, 24.09.2014 at 11:55

meanwhile in russia

i once saw a video of a bear cycling and playing an instrument

Oh look, another thread ruined by Tik-Tok.

Ecrit par Skittzophrenic, 24.09.2014 at 17:06

Oh look, another thread ruined by Tik-Tok.

Hi Skittz

Ecrit par Tik-Tok, 24.09.2014 at 10:27

But this is your Anarchy at work, CD. A borderless territory of groups fighting for a piece. Sure, intervention from different factions caused this but this is your Anarchy. Without borders, without territories, without a stable government and without populace union, power groups will eventually form. You should be happy to see the realistic conclusion to your wonderful stateless, borderless dream.

Just ignorance. You don't know shit!

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 14:57

Ecrit par 4Chan, 24.09.2014 at 07:49

Ecrit par Guest, 24.09.2014 at 07:17

Ecrit par 4Chan, 23.09.2014 at 15:32

Maybe USA wants them to rebel so they can cull the non whites

lolwut

Bitch?

Your post os bad, and you should feel bad, Now gatorade me bitch

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

1.Please dont confuse Marxism with Anarchism and on another note, dont confuse communism with anarchism.They are not the same.

Anarchism has many of its roots from Marxism. 99% of Anarchists are 'socialists' or Anarcho communists. Anarcho capitalists are a fringe off shoot with more links to some pseudo Austrian economics babble which is hilariously even more absurd than the anarcho communists.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

2.Marxist professors dominate education, thats a little absurd lol.Scools nowdays, in my opinion, promote capitalism,

Your opinion is shit then. Education is dominated by Marxist. DO I need to whip out a dozen links to prove this? The vast, vast majority of American university professors are Democrat. The majority sympathise with Marxism. Student Unions are dominated by Marxists. Both the education ministry and indoctrinated students censor speech as much as possible while ensuring Republican or just Conservative professors from gaining employment. It has nothing to do with a lack of educated Republican professors and everything to do with the Educational narrative which is firmly progressive.

Education institutions in Europe are no different. Progressive 'Diversity' is enforced within almost all levels of Western education which promotes white privilege and firmly blames capitalism. Claiming universities promote Capitalism is laughable. I'm no capitalist but I'm not going to let you talk such drivel.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

obedience to government and its laws, respect for religion and conservatism.

Where? In some deep southern private school? Western Education is dominated by Marxists. Not capitalists. Don't get me wrong, these people are the worst kind of bourgeoisie, but that doesn't stop them being mouth dribbling Marxists.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

They make for good little sheeps, programmed to conserve capitalism, who in most cases lack individuality and free thinking, thats why youth is so easily corrupted by facist groups, also.

Wait, Fascists groups are created because we (HA HA) are indoctrinated by Capitalist dominated universities. This is fucking atrocious, especially from you. Fascism/ National Socialism is its own political and economic field which takes pieces from multiple political areas. It is UTTERLY vilified in all Education, Media and Politics. Don't go claim it isn't, it bloody well is and you know it is.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

*not to foget the obvious also.That most facist groups serve governments interests in many different ways.In most cases, the governments allow these facist groups, political or not, to exist and always serve a puspose.

That is why the US government has been murdering and imprisoning these groups leaders for over 60 years. Recently, they milled one in prison. Edgar Steele. A good man, never harmed a soul.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Not to forget also, that right wing and facists were always supportive of the big businesses,

Supportive? By Nationalising it and dictating what it produces? Next you'll say they privatised farming to ebil industrialists in Germany. top kek.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

the banks, the elite and where the big money went

The NSDAP was not funded by any banks. At all. This is fabricated nonsense. The only evidence of this is a single piece of paper to the name a of banker who doesn't even in exist on record. Wall Street fucking hated the NSDAP, American industrialists helped the NSDAP, banks worked against it.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

So a governments real enemy is never a facist, but a leftist.Or an anarchist.Or a communist.

That is why communist parties are legal and government subsidised? That is why Marxism is taught and dominates Education. That's why Education enforces Diversity and White Privilege upon students? That is why massive banking cartels fund Progressive and Marxist groups?

You are living in a fantasy if you believe this. In the UK, if you are just a member of the BNP, you cant get government employment, nor you can you work in schools. But if you are a card carrying commie with a hammer and sickle tattoo and a member of a radical Marxist organisation, the door is opened for you.

You are talking bollocks if you believe this. Fascism has been hit and beaten for decades, its proponents murdered, vilified, sacked and harassed.

YOU are NOT the enemy of the Establishment. You have ALWAYS been its pawn, you promote globalist ideals that THEY created.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

3.There are alot of groups who promote facism.Political (uk has a strong one, doesnt it?) and non-political.

ALL of which are harassed non stop by government subsidised groups. Marxists are given validity in media, Fascism is vilified. YOUR own country of Greece is a perfect example. Are the communist parties arrested by government without any justification? Fuck no. But the Fascists are. But do you question that? No. You are a sheep.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

They are like a spider-web, who attract dissapointed and confused young people.

That's right. Apparently, these emotions people feel are a fine justification for communist radicalism but if a Fascist seeks fellow radicals unhappy with the establishment, we suddenly become predators. This hypocritical horse shit is getting old.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

They can be very convincing, to people who are half-informed about whats going on around them

I'm the most informed person you ever met. Your entire justification for MultiCulturalism despite hours of debate where every level of your justification was destroyed, you claimed we need it to prevent nuclear war. How can you call yourself informed?

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

and who never learn to open their minds,

Right. Because Fascists who take YEARS to developed their ideology because there isn't a SINGLE GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION that backs such theory are close minded but dumb kids who get taught by their Marxist professors are beacons of illuminated open minds. Open minded? Puulease.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

get brainwashed there.

>Independent research in deeply controversial topics resulting in a Fascist identity is brainwashed.
>Decades of Marxist theory in Universities isn't.

Hilarious.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

4.Atwar censors some posts, that is true.But sometimes it has to do with the objectiveness, bias, motives of the poster and the post itself and the facts and evidence that support a said claim or a statement.Examples is how i made a strong case about the misconseptions about Jews and their past and how the media and governments are disgustingly victimize and lie about them.I provided evidence and facts, supported by impartial historians and journalists to prove that the Jewish community, has acted throughout history in such a malicious, provocative and power-hungry way, that justifies every misfortune and tragedy, that ever happened to them.Nobody erased that post.Strong, well constructed, valid arguments, backed up by evidence and facts to support your conclusion, is the correct way to do this.

I was banned for 3 times for answering a persons question. At no point did I incite violence, incite hate or use vulgar language during those answers. It was censorship. Plain oldskool Marxist censorship. The bans were unjustified in each case when another mod after a week grew the balls to stand up the other bias mods with an agenda.

Now name a single Fascist on the mod team... right. How many are communists? Exactly.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

I admire and respect Marx and value him as one of the greatest philosophers.That being said he is not my source of inspiration, or the basic figure of my ideology, so you can stop calling him out, on every oppurtunity.Your point that Marxism led to Stalinism and the "bad" communism, is exactly the difference between anarchism and marxism, in practise.I will explain below.

"B-b-but Anarchism isn't ab-b-bout M-M-Marxism...." You are literally posting two opposing answers within the same post. 10/10

Here comes the 'No True Scotsman fallacy' where Marxist theory gets explained like it usually does and yet fails to realise that in practise it ends EXACTLY THE SAME WAY for the very reasons this rebuttal is replying to. Lets jump right in shall we?

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

You start by decentralizing and decreasing the government's powers.

Already, out into the field with illogical theory. You hear this folks? State power which has grown over centuries is going to just relinquish it, for no reason at all. Right now, state powers are increasing at rates never seen before in human history. But apparently, its all going to magically decentralise despite zero evidence of this happening.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Then tax like a motherfucker the big money and the big businesses.

So much for anarchism. You realise they are ALREADY taxing business. France has a 75% tax rate for 1,000,000+. Guess where they will all run to? Low tax havens.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Then add people, to all decision-making in all national AND foreign matters.(hi daily referendums)

omg... its getting worse... this is high school tier theory. Even Marx would slap you for this. Add 'people.' THE people or just some people. Daily referendums? So democracy... wow, so much has changed... its like, so revolutionary. Its a democracy... where we have elections ever day!!! Oh wait, he probably means elected representatives will vote daily... like a parliament...

REVOLUTIONARY ANARCHISM EVERYONE!

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Then you slowly get rid of other forms of authority, that work like a cancer, on human prosperity and evolution,

Yeah, that hierarchy we just created with 'peoples representatives' is going to dissolve for no reason. Human prosperity everyone. If I say this vague term, people will just believe what I say. SAY IT WITH ME 'HUMAN PROSPERITY" Who cares about actual descriptive theory, lets use vague terms. No one will call us out on it.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

like religion and military

Yeah, get rid of military. Who needs that shit? 50,000 years of constant warfare? Forget that shit, lets hold hands because now everyone on the planet suddenly lost all their primordial instincts. Even the Muslims who have zero history of anarchistic theory. They will just hold hands together and say 'Fuck Allah.'

Even Tito talks more sense than this, 'barbie.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

You reconstruct the educational system.A complete overhaul.And you start going through the whole constitution and laws, from the beginning, making changes, slowly,patiently, testing them one by one, using refrerendums again.This will take alot of work and TIME, to work and show results.But its a start.And a path to a better world.And a step closer to anarchy.Not so utopian now, is it?That was my proposal.

I'm not even going to give a rebuttal to this childish shit. I'm above it. Reconstruct society from the ground up after states magically and slowly decentralise while we tax big business who the whole time will just let it happen, ignoring the multitude of cultures and states who wont enter int this. Then setup DAILY elections, which are totally trustworthy run by elected representatives (because there is no fucking way you can get billions to vote daily) who are totally honest and apparently unlike other politicians because MUH ANARCHISM.

This is childish as fuck.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

What is yours?What do the right wing facists, or capitalists propose for our future?Other than war, poverty, misery, aids and the destruction of our planet?

Don't compare us to capitalists. The Fascist seeks the interests of his Nation and people. Sustainable interests. Fascists were the ones who opposed these foreign wars. It was the leader of the BNP in the UK who solely prevented Britain going to war with Syria.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

The middle east is a perfect example, of what happens when countries are subjected to facism for too long.

They are not Fascists. Calling them Fascists is infantile. Authoritarian doesn't automatically mean 'Fascism.' Its also ignorant to think Islamic culture has any major similarity to European culture. Its a different world over there with its own cultural influences. They are socially conservative authoritarians, that is about as far as the similarity goes.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

And im sorry but no exceptions, from me.Some of the countries there, have ties with the West and are a little more modern, but the WHOLE middle east, is facism 101.Facism

You are a joke.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

that goes hand to hand with illeteracy

Germany had one of the highest literacy rates.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

uneducated people

German tech was decades ahead of everyone else.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

fear

Vague meaningless term.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

poverty

Fascism rose its citizens out of poverty.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

diseases

Fascism was one of the first westernised health care institutions.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

deprivation of human rights

Meaningless vague term with no meaning. Human rights are horse shit.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

and liberties,

Germans had free association, the ability to create small private business, government subsidies for children, government subsidised holidays, guaranteed labour and also had the greatest era of gun control deregulation in German History. Germans were arguably more 'free' than the average American today. Even political prisoners in Dachau were able to vote in elections.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

And yes you are right, in the end communism, facism and Islamism are one and the same.

They aren't at all. Not even close. Your joke level is increasing to Tito levels.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

They are all based on oppression and power.

Germans were oppressed... by giving them greater access to arms?

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

They have a history of making the world a shittier place.

Fascism opposed the Establishment, that is why it was crushed. A German dominated Europe would be much, much better place than the shithole Europe is today.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Care to prove me wrong?

I just did.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

because your comparison was not only falacious, but looked like a 10 year old came up with it.

It was entirely based in reality. You have not spent a single use of this post to refute what was said.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

You compared an ultra facist moovement with anarchim, just because of one similarity.

No. You can call Anarchism a political ideology but it essentially means a stateless society. My post showed how such a stateless territory becomes that way. It is ALWAYS through rapid destablisation and the radical violence that comes with it. Your scenario of slow dencetralisation is NEVER going to happen. That is not how human behaviour works, that is now how geopolitics functions.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Respecting peoples colour

Its race. Not colour. Don't do that shit. Race has nothing to do with pigmentation.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

beliefs

No one respects opposing beliefs. What do you think what happen to Fascists in this stateless territory? You have already made it clear you would tax people to insane levels while banning religion. You aren't an anarchist.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

and sexuality

Why should sexualities be respected?

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

And yes i am sorry for fearing a nuclear war.I am sorry for fearing that we deplete our planets resources.I am sorry that i care for us fucking up our planet and dancing near its destruction.

Grow up, child. Multiculturalism causes tensions, it doesn't alleviate them.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

Russia, China and Middle East have all made their decisions and their intentions are clear.If i want to be realistic, i have little hope for them.They act in such an un-democratic way, that make weak candidates for these kinds of changes.They have more in-common with facism.I already discussed about these countries governments violations of human rights and against the liberties of their people, i think no point to bring these up again.The west however yes.I know the capitalism monster is big and scary, but i have hope.One step at a time.Internet is a gift.

So wait, the West will become stateless while the East remains powerful state dominated. And you want to disband our military? HA HA HA.

Your name really suits you now, Barbie.

Ecrit par Khal.eesi, 24.09.2014 at 13:52

I trully believe people will start waking up.They already have.And the weapon is not a kalashnikov, but free information and knowledge.Made available through the internet.

>Chinese
>rebelling

They butchered tens of millions of their own people. SO did the Russians. Did they 'rebel?' No, they didn't. Your ideology is a joke, and I just showed you why.

I don't work with 'belief.' I work with facts and reality. Not wishy washy child like utopias grounded in theory that looks like it was conceived by a high schooler.Which it clearly was.