12.01.2015 - 10:35
This isn't a massive game with millions of people competing, this is a small environment with about 1k regular players. If you ban too many people, you will barely get enough players to play your maps. And the video game industry is extremely different. Elasticity in the gaming industry is very tight because you cannot easily substitute one game for another. Some random guy can't suddenly start a video game company and make master video games within a few months time. The games that are released by EA are very hard to substitute for, and therefore, they can afford being a dick to players because there is no viable substitute, and their games will be played anyways. AtWar games, however, are very elastic. You can make a very good map within a few months that can easily compete with other maps. That is why we have 4 GGGs, as well as many other colonial maps, along with at least 3 popular WWIs, 2 popular WWIIs (although one of them is down right now), 3 RPs, a bunch of Napoleons, and at least 5 ancient worlds. With this kind of market, it is very easily to substitute one map for another, and mapmakers will suffer the consequences of being a dick to players if they act in such a way. It is more like if McDonalds suddenly decided to double the price of their products and randomly throw people out of their store. Sales at McDonalds would plummet because going to Burger King or Harvey's or Wendy's or KFC is also an option, and the prices are much lower, and you don't need to worry about being thrown out. The fast food industry is very elastic because one fast food joint is so easy to substitute with another one. Therefore, they need to please customers to stay competitive. AtWar maps work in the exact same way. Lrn2Econ
Yes, but them playing my maps reduced my ability to enjoy the game as I am pissed off that someone I don't like is enjoying my property. Also, moderators having to interfere with ban lists makes it harder for them to maintain the game, while it would be so much easier if they didn't have any work to do.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Rankist Sharck Ce compte a été effacé |
12.01.2015 - 15:09 Rankist Sharck Ce compte a été effacé I never said this rule should protect players who ruin games, I am saying that you can limit other player's playability for absurd reasons, which breaks the rules as they have not broke the map nor game rules if we allow map makers to ban whoever and why the hell they want. And the mods aren't complaining about their work.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
12.01.2015 - 15:19
All i have to say is you are all pedantic immature children and especially mapmakers. Provide legit reason,add SS and then add to banlist.Simple as that.Grow the fuck up already.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 15:22
Khal is right
---- It's not the end.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 15:27
actually it doesnt say anything about banning, I as a player want the full ability of the game that is not interfered by trolls, or rule breakers or just assholes who ruin every game I make and host, so it is in my protection to protect my freedom to enjoy the game, the second people break the rules of a map they are breaking the idea of people enjoying the game, personal motives, while unethical, are still a person (map makers) way of helping his/her gameplay to be enjoyable, that is how the rules are put, it doesnt give clear statement to either side so you can not say the devs meant the rules to mean bans are illegal if not approved by mods.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 16:19
Playing on someone's map is not a "right" given to you by the admins or rules ...its a "privilege" given to you by the map maker.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 16:32
This ^ And if mods are threatening to punish mapmakers for banning people with no reason then how about this: We let the atwar community vote on what should require for a ban to be put it place (ex.: screenshot, etc.) Until then map makers should deserve to get the right to ban who they want as there is no rule stated by admins and/or mods and no rule set in stone.
---- [pr] Your Camel: Al Fappino: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap, what day is it fap? If you go on ebay and find a life, lmk so i can give you cash so u can get it-Commando Eagle
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 16:44
Good job goblin yeah give them support.the answer is no, the fucking little brats cant ban people for no reason and thats the end of it.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 16:52
In my opinion, nobody is in any position to demand anything from a map maker or can he be bound by any rules, beside the preventive SP farming one on which mods already have authority. I am at the moment making a map ...i didn't sign a "service contract" with the admins, im not geting payed for this. I payed for to be able to make maps ...its mine and if i want i can wipe my ass with it (delete it). So how can i have an ultimate power like that ...yet be denied a lesser power on my own creation? @Khal ...i already said this, but i doubt anyone with any sense would ban anyone for absolutely no reason what so ever ...what is the worst that could come from this? Players who want to play on the map but also want to be assholes and trolls actually being forced to chose one of this things? Less assholes and trolls ...god forbid.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 16:59
I would have banned you too if you go and talk shit about my map. As the end, you are welcome to play other maps or make your own.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 17:03
Indeed.
---- [pr] Your Camel: Al Fappino: fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap, what day is it fap? If you go on ebay and find a life, lmk so i can give you cash so u can get it-Commando Eagle
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 17:08
What about you stop being a entitle cunt. Its time for a grape analogy =D I am promoting my Grape company by feeding you (free) grapes to your mouth (for free), while taking away bad grapes in order to make sure you only get good grapes and have a wonderful experience, yet you still want me to give you a screen shoot of every single grape i discard, and threat to take away my ability to remove grapes if i don't follow your instruction.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 17:11
>Calls us immature >Doesn't actually provide an argument, just uses a bunch of swear words and gets pissy
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 17:36
I kek'd
---- TJM !!!
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 18:06
I agree with you! I've come to realize you map makers, the ones making a big deal out of nothing, truly are selfish immature children. Do you guys fail to realize none of this would be possible if the developers wouldn't have create this game? Instead of bitching, be thankful they allow all of us to create something because of their HARD work. You complain how difficult it is to create a map, try creating atWar. How would you feel if the developers decided to ban one of you guys simply because they didn't like you, but allowed other trolls to play their game. You would think it is unfair, right? If you want to ban someone because you don't like them, simply ban them from your games but don't ban them from your entire map because of personal issues. If you want to ban someone for breaking the rules on your map, you have every right to do so. But, don't forget to provide evidence(Screenshots) to any mods, if questioned about the ban. Also, your map does not belong to you completely. I would say it belongs to the community, but you just happen to be the creator. Yes, you created the map but who is giving you the tools to create the map? If one of the developers decided to ban you from atWar, they could potentially keep your map and allow the public to use it. You would not be able to do a thing about it. There is no official contract stating the map belongs to you. It's really just an illusion some of you have created in your mind. Get over it and let people enjoy the game, that's what most of us come here to do.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 18:22
A lot of problems with all that crap above you said ... - developers of this game are earning money from their creation, map makers dont - they gave us the tools? ...i fuckin payed for that tools > turning this into "map makers" banning for no reason - banned and map keep'd ...perma-ban i suppose? ...is this extortion and threatning? - lastly ...no official contract that the map belongs to the map maker? ...do you know anything about contracts at all, because that was retarded. I can delete my map without anyone's consent? ...map is mine -----> all the wisdom, and that little thing is kind of a "silent contract" here (real contract not something i made up).
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 18:22
I am thankful for their hard work, but admins have nothing to do with this. This is moderator abuse, not administrative abuse. Second of all, I am a premium player. I contributed to this game. I payed them, and that is the thanks they get for their hard work. I bought their product. It may be their hard work, but it is thanks to contributors like me that the website is up and running.
I wouldn't be a dick to the developers, and I also wouldn't do something worthy of kicking me off the game. If the devs began to randomly ban people, this game would get less plays because people would think that is BS.
It does not belong to the fucking community. It belongs to me. It is my fucking property because I made it, I am the one who can edit it, I am the one who can delete it. Nobody else has that power besides me unless they abused the system which is against the rules. This isn't some communist fucking friendship circle where we all sit on a fucking carpet and suck the tits of Ms. Sunshine in the kindergarten classroom while we share our fucking toys and stick crayons up our asses while still not understanding why we get erections. This is a game where we have property, and I expect, to a certain degree, that what I make belongs to me. If you want this to be Happy Kukuo fuckwad land where we all hold hands and sing about how we are huge faggots, go ahead and make it such, but I'm not going to contribute to it.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 18:38
The only people that disagree with map makers are either mods (the problem here) and people with personal vendettas with map makers that will bitch about them at any given time (like you) Be thankful that we actually create content for YOU to enjoy, we are literally PAYING the admins to make maps FOR YOU to enjoy, yet you act as if you were fucking entitle to our maps and it was our job to make them.
Do you realize we pay the admins to allow us to create maps? your entire point is irrelevant as atwar isn't really free, we actually pay to use it.
You don't ban customers if you want to keep your business running. In your case, you aren't paying anything to me and i never promise you any service.
I can always delete my maps, even hide them. can you delete or hide my maps? oh yeah you can't. Does the map have your name? nope it has mine. your shitty attitude is only going to make map makers hide their maps, and to host them personally once in a while (kicking people like you)
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 18:59
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 19:00
Goblin, Tunder and Kentucky are right here, map makers have the power over their own maps, yes the admins own atwar but this conversation was never about admins, you guys who are raging at us @Fuehrer @Khal @others are not even reading what we are complaining about, I do not see any conflict with admins since they never get involved, the problem is that the mods, who did not create the game, who do nothing but moderate the player base, are getting cocky and trying to impose more problems on a part of atwar that they dont really have power over, mods even said that they did not want some powers like the power to delete maps, clearly mods do not want to be invested in dealing with map makers but now they are interested because we are actually given some power by the admins. And now that the admins gave us banlist, now people start bitching about map makers and calling for all this change shit, people just cant get over the fact that someone other then the precious mods has some kind of power on atwar.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 19:18
More powers to mapmakers? more mapmakers to power!! Heil Tiktok!!
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 21:26
Just a small reminder: banlists were implemented to avoid failed games because of leavers, trolls, wall-fuggers, etc. Not as a particular exercise of power for the sake of personal benefits. It is a tool to ensure that the community can enjoy scenarios and maps without disruption. Just ave a look at the forum posts that led to the implementation of this feature. Mods were the first to discuss and support critically this tool. So don't tell me to mind my own business! As Mod and Map-Maker I fully support the implementation of this feature to strengthen the community (as a whole and not the power of a few).
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 21:31
Bah! Nothing to do with low or high quality SS. Just make proper SS that is a real evidence that player is hampering the enjoyment of one of your maps. Do you know how to do it? I guess you do. You are very active in forums, map-making, gaming, etc. Don't be lazy with the bans. That's all.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 21:49
---- It's not the end.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 21:57
The problem is that the ban list serves to help with the reasons that you said, but taking into the very rare cases when people are banned for personal reasons makes people paranoid and focusing on personal bans. The issue is that if mods either take down the system or change it to force map makers to go to mods to approve bans or whatever crazy ideas are out there, it would mean that the minuet times of people being banned for personal reasons would outweigh the legitimate bans made by us as map makers to prevent trolls from playing. This system will never be perfect but we need something and this is the best option out there.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 22:26
and that is what everybody uses them for
give me 1 example of a decent map maker doing this^
you are neither necessary or wanted to regularize ban lists, what you and other mods are doing is that every time somebody reports abuse you guys assume the map maker is abusing the feature until proven innocent, this is going to alienate all the map makers because with that mentally everybody will challenge all the bans, and some map makers haven't and will not give a flying fuck if somebody cries or not so they aren't going to provide you with evidence. right now you are being as ambiguous as fucking possible, you haven't taken any stance besides talking like a diplomat and saying "everything is ok and the best decision will be made, plz move along and this never happen". There is 3 stances about bans: 1.- Map makers are guilty until proven innocent (this is what mods are doing, which is bullshit, and this stance has already been proven to be completely wrong) 2.- Map makers own the custom maps, therefore they have the final decision of who plays it or not (most makers support this stance) 3.- Status quo: map maker bans can only be challenge in the special forum section dedicated to this matter (private reports don't count)
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 23:01
Incorrect. This is not what mods are after. Scenario: - An assumed trouble maker is put on a map makers ban list, and the map maker is perfectly fine doing that. A problem occurs when this claim is challenged, at this point I assume said trouble maker has attempted to talk to the map maker. If nothing is resolved, a third party is called, aka moderators. The "trouble maker" in this scenario is innocent until proven guilty when your claim is challenged. I don't care what you have on your ban lists, I don't go around looking at every single one. They could all be blank for all I know. However, I am obligated to care when a complaint arises, so I'll go look, and this is when you can display a simple screen shot substantiating your claim. With that screen shot I can tell the plaintiff to go away. Problem solved. There is one stance about ban lists: - Map makers are free to do what they wish. When someone disagrees with something they have done, the burden is on the map maker to justify their actions. Solution: Stop being unprepared. Re-read my post from the first page:
I've been repeating myself over and over.
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 23:20
None of these options have been considered. As Mod and map-maker I oppose both of them.
You are definitely right. Fully agree.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
12.01.2015 - 23:31
Not really. There are many bans that are insulting and have absolutely no legit foundation beyond "I don't like this player so he is banned from my maps".
There are many and you know that. No reason to go into details... some "reasons" given by some respected map-makers:
And I could go on...
See Desu's comment.
----
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
|
Chargement...
Chargement...
|
Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.
Êtes-vous certain(e) ?