Obtenir une Soubscription pour cacher toutes les annonces
Messages: 9   Visité par: 93 users
23.05.2012 - 14:15
Is this intended? E.G. forming a defence line from the UK to France using land units only and no naval units.
Chargement...
Chargement...
23.05.2012 - 17:55
Yeah that's intended.
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
Chargement...
Chargement...
23.05.2012 - 22:42
Why?
Chargement...
Chargement...
23.05.2012 - 22:55
Because that's how the game works...?
y so many questions
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
Chargement...
Chargement...
24.05.2012 - 06:43
Because units can defend sea from the land in a small channel. it makes sense.

think of instead of a trench, just a sea barrage from either side.
Chargement...
Chargement...
24.05.2012 - 08:10
I dont think naval units can attack a defence line formed this way right?
Chargement...
Chargement...
24.05.2012 - 09:34
Yeah, the naval units can attack it.
There's water "under" the defense line, no?
----
~Somewhere in the distance an eagle shrieked as it rode an American buffalo to an apple-pie-eating contest at a baseball field.~
Chargement...
Chargement...
24.05.2012 - 23:46
Okay then theres no problem. I was thinking you could form defence lines over the ocean that couldnt be attacked by naval units...
Chargement...
Chargement...
25.05.2012 - 05:31
Actually this can happen because you have to attack the units to attack the wall, if the unit is on a land that the naval unit can't reach, then the naval unit can't attack
Chargement...
Chargement...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Confidentialité | Conditions d'utilisations | Bannières | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Rejoignez-nous sur

Passez le mot